Bariatric Surgery: Weight-Loss Miracle or just a Hardcore Dietary “Enforcement Tool”?

Not to talk smack about anyone who has had baraitric surgery – if you did and it worked for you, great, that’s awesome. I would never fault anyone who is trying to improve themselves regardless of how they do it. I’m more speaking to the growing number of people who are being led to believe that its “the only way out”. Much to my agitation, I watch a lot of Discovery, TLC and Discovery Health shows – and I have a particular fascination with ones that deal with obesity (Brookhaven Obesity Clinic, Big Medicine, as well as those random specials ‘Half-Ton Dad’, ‘Born Without A Face’, etc).

You’ve seen these shows I’m sure. Some are inspirational and full of hope, and others are just downright depressing and borderline exploitative.

Well, lately even the uplifting ones have started to bother me. People who push bariatric surgery as a profession (like Big Medicine) seem to be playing a big role as enablers to their patients and on obese American viewers as a whole. I think that its launched a cavalcade of “Poor Me” thinking as opposed to more productive “I Have Adversity to Overcome” mentalities. I think it enforces this idea of obese people being “trapped”, because that’s exactly how they are referenced to. They are treated as innocent victims of a toxic world, unable to rise above their predicaments.

(which we all know is only HALF true – its IS a poisonous world, but the antidote is information)

Now, before I continue, I’m obviously making broad and sweeping generalizations, each case is different – but I think that in a large way people seeing these shows can’t help but identify with the problems they see, and then when the all-knowing reality TV doctors say things like, “We see surgery as the only way you can ever lose this weight”. What are they supposed to think? Now we’ve got more people walking around being obese and unhealthy thinking “Its genetic, there isn’t anything I can do about it, except surgery that I can’t afford. Oh well.”

Maybe its just classically “American” to blame everything else around us except that problem at hand.
Right? Spread the fault around and maybe none of it will touch us.

Well, “pardon my french”, but I think that’s just bullsh*t.

Why does weight loss have to be a “culture of blame, shame and circular reasoning”? People need to OWN their faults as well as their strengths.

Here is a radical idea that will hopefully get you thinking.

I recently watched one of Gary Taubes university lectures online where at the end he makes a brief reference to Bariatric Surgery possibly only being effective due to the diet restrictions and wished someone would do some comparative studies on it.

Well, it got me thinking about that very concept. What if a study WAS done in a “placebo” fashion. Obviously we can’t do double-blind here but still – let’s say we had the 2 groups where one group HAD the surgery and was put on the post-surgery diet (which is tiny portions, vitamin supplements, and quite low-carb to boot) like a normal post-op patient would be – and another group who DIDN’T have the surgery but was forced to eat the same diet. I say “forced” because obviously if the post-surgery group were to eat inappropriately they’d be in great discomfort – so we’d need to enforce the same on the “placebo” side.

What would the results be 6, 12 or 18 months later?

I’d be willing to bet that the weight loss numbers would be shockingly similar – without costly (and possibly dangerous,even fatal) surgery.

So, as my post title says – is bariatric surgery effective because of the bypass surgery itself – or because of the lifestyle changes that it FORCES its patients to follow?

Sometimes the “quick fix” isn’t what its cracked up to be.

What does everybody think?


(please don’t be offended if you disagree – in fact, I expect a number of people to disagree, if so – let me know in the comments, but please keep it civil – this is a family show!)

Related posts:

  1. Basics 1: Easy, Quick, and Safe Weight Loss

  • Ben P
    Those diets do work. They are sometimes called semi-starvation liquid diets. They are basically protein shakes and vitamins. I don't think they don't work very well long term though. The Cambridge Diet is one example. I do wonder if such a diet done for 30 days or so followed immediately by a ketogenic diet might work well for many people.
  • salvadorvalencia
    Hello! I find your post very interesting and it proposes a very compelling idea. However, in my particular opinion, I think you overlooked something that may end up affecting the outcome of the proposed study. And that is that people who undergo surgery are anatomicaly and in some cases physiologicaly changed. That is, for the "placebo" group as you called them, there would be no restriction nor lack of ghrelin (hunger hormone) production that the surgery produces, so you can give the placebo subjets a diet with portion control but they will be unsatisfied and hungry, when compared with the operated group. For the gastric bypass patients, even eating the same amount, the placebo would be in disadvantage due to the lack of malabsortion the gastric bypass produces. In other words, although I agree with you that it is the lifestyle changes and the better food choices what ultimately make patients succeed after surgery, in most cases that would be very diffucult or impossible to achieve without the dramatic change the surgery poses.
  • Greetings! Sorry for the delay in my response. Thank you very much for the info on ghrelin production being constricted in surgeyr patients, I found an interesting PDF on it here (http://jcem.endojournals.org/cgi/reprint/88/7/2999.pdf), I hadn't considered that at all.

    Its also interesting that the literature also states that a proper balance of ghrelin is necessary for the body to balance its weight naturally, showing that it is partially responsible for low-calorie (i.e. low-satisfaction) diet failing in the long term - due to levels being high and triggering a "constantly hungry" signal. I'm sure anyone who's been on a low-fat / low-calorie diet can attest to.

    In my mind, its just one more plus for a low-carb / high-protein / high-fat diet - since the consumption of dietary fat triggers the body to have a "full" sensation far earlier than high-carb fare. I would assume that (from the PDF) ghrelin is responsible for triggering this "off switch" for food consumption.

    If anyone can elaborate, I'd welcome it.

    I guess its safe to say that we weren't ever meant to have our stomachs artifically shrunken OR eat tiny amounts of food - both are less than optimal, yet we bully and shame people into both "solutions". If they only knew what some of us now know...
blog comments powered by Disqus